ÚTEFČVUT Ústav technické a experimentální fyziky ČVUT v PrazeInstitute of Experimental and Applied Physics, CTU in Prague

Study of edgeless radiation detector with 3D spatial mapping technique

NázevTitle
Study of edgeless radiation detector with 3D spatial mapping techniqueStudy of edgeless radiation detector with 3D spatial mapping technique
Druh výsledkuResult type
Článek v časopiseJournal article
AutořiAuthors
X. Wu, J. Kalliopuska, M. Jakůbek, J. Jakůbek, A. Gadda, S. Eranen
Klíčová slovaKeywords
Solid state detectors, Particle tracking detector, X-ray detector
DOIDOI
10.1088/1748-0221/9/04/C04004
Časopis / citaceJournal / citation
Journal of Instrumentation 9(04), C04004-C04004 (2014) · ISSN 1748-0221
RokYear
2014
JazykLanguage
eng
ZáznamyRecords
ProjektProject
Pracoviště pro nedestruktivní testování, diagnostiku a 3D zobrazování pomocí neutronové radiografie a tomografie (2011-2015, TA0/TA)Facility for nondestructive testing, diagnostics and 3D imaging based on neutron radiography and tomography.
CitovánoCited by
9 (OpenAlex)
2016: 22017: 22018: 02019: 12020: 12021: 02022: 22023: 02024: 1
Plný text (open access)Full text (open access)
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-0221/9/04/C04004/pdf
Citace ke staženíDownload citation
TXT · BibTeX

AbstraktAbstract

Edgeless radiation detector has gained increased attention due to its superiority in the defect-free edge fabrication and the capability to minimize the insensitive area at the detector edge. The doped edge in the edgeless detector is at the same potential with the back plane and causes a local distortion of the electric field at the detector edge. The deformed electric field alters the charge collection of the edge pixel and leads to an inaccurate charge interpolation. To study the influence of active edges on the response of edge pixels, we used an advanced X-ray based 3D spatial mapping technique to visually show the charge collection volumes of pixels. Various edgeless detectors with diverse polarities, thicknesses and edge-to-pixel distances were investigated. For the n-on-p (n+/p−/p+) edgeless detector, the mapping shows that the p-spray isolation method has the advantage of achieving a greater sensitive edge region compared to the p-stop method. And the p-on-p (p+/p−/n+) edgeless detector, reported for the first time, functions for both spatial and energy signals. The n-type edgeless detectors were studied together with a standard Medipix detector with the guard ring design. The results show that the edgeless detector is capable of maximally utilizing the edge region of the detector as the charge sensitive volume, while the standard Medipix detector has still vast insensitive region at the edge. The X-ray spectroscopic measurements with 241Am and 55Fe sources performed on all detectors gives a similar conclusion and proves the 3D spatial mapping results.

Edgeless radiation detector has gained increased attention due to its superiority in the defect-free edge fabrication and the capability to minimize the insensitive area at the detector edge. The doped edge in the edgeless detector is at the same potential with the back plane and causes a local distortion of the electric field at the detector edge. The deformed electric field alters the charge collection of the edge pixel and leads to an inaccurate charge interpolation. To study the influence of active edges on the response of edge pixels, we used an advanced X-ray based 3D spatial mapping technique to visually show the charge collection volumes of pixels. Various edgeless detectors with diverse polarities, thicknesses and edge-to-pixel distances were investigated. For the n-on-p (n+/p−/p+) edgeless detector, the mapping shows that the p-spray isolation method has the advantage of achieving a greater sensitive edge region compared to the p-stop method. And the p-on-p (p+/p−/n+) edgeless detector, reported for the first time, functions for both spatial and energy signals. The n-type edgeless detectors were studied together with a standard Medipix detector with the guard ring design. The results show that the edgeless detector is capable of maximally utilizing the edge region of the detector as the charge sensitive volume, while the standard Medipix detector has still vast insensitive region at the edge. The X-ray spectroscopic measurements with 241Am and 55Fe sources performed on all detectors gives a similar conclusion and proves the 3D spatial mapping results.

↑ NahoruTop